Benchmark: spread vs mutation vs Object.assign for forEach callback

Tests:

with spread operator
const range = (from, to) => { const output = [] for(var x = from; x < to; x++){ output.push(x) } return output } let acc = {}; range(0, 10).forEach((num) => { acc = { ...acc, [num]: num } })
with mutation
const range = (from, to) => { const output = [] for(var x = from; x < to; x++){ output.push(x) } return output } let acc = {}; range(0, 10).forEach((num) => { acc[num] = num })
with object assign
const range = (from, to) => { const output = [] for(var x = from; x < to; x++){ output.push(x) } return output } let acc = {}; range(0, 10).forEach((num) => { acc = Object.assign(acc, {[num]: num}) })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:98.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/98.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 98 on Mac OS X 10.15

spread vs mutation vs Object.assign for forEach callback (version: 0)