Benchmark: weakmap vs closure

Script Preparation code:

function A() {
	var x = 0;
	return {
		incr() { x ++ },
		get() { return x },
	}
}
var closure = A();
closure.incr()

var wm = new WeakMap();
function B() {
	var x = {
		incr() { wm.set(x, (wm.get(x) || 1)+1) },
		get() { return wm.get(x) },
	}
	return x
}
var weakmap = B();
weakmap.incr()

Tests:

closure get
closure.get()
weakmap get
weakmap.get()
closure incr
closure.incr()
weakmap incr
weakmap.incr()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
closure get
weakmap get
closure incr
weakmap incr

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/73.0.3683.75 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 73 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
closure get	14974800.0 Ops/sec
weakmap get	6575907.0 Ops/sec
closure incr	15423470.0 Ops/sec
weakmap incr	4132445.0 Ops/sec

weakmap vs closure (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: closure get vs weakmap get vs closure incr vs weakmap incr

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

closure get

weakmap get

closure incr

weakmap incr

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A