Benchmark: Jquery-Mobile-Load-Speed-Test

HTML Preparation code:

<head>
    <title>Hello World!</title> 
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
    <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>Curonsys</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
</div>
</body>

Script Preparation code:

function loadScript(url, callback) {
	var script = document.createElement('script');
	script.src = url;
	script.onload = callback;
	document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);
}
var loaded = function() {
	document.write(str);
}

Tests:

v145
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js', loaded);
v132
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.3.2/jquery.mobile-1.3.2.min.js', loaded);
v112
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.1.2/jquery.mobile-1.1.2.min.js', loaded);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
v145
v132
v112

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 8.0.0; MI 6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/75.0.3770.101 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 75 on Android 8.0.0

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
v145	2647.2 Ops/sec
v132	1258.1 Ops/sec
v112	980.3 Ops/sec

Jquery-Mobile-Load-Speed-Test (version: 0)

jinungcho20190627

Comparing performance of: v145 vs v132 vs v112

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

v145

v132

v112

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A