Benchmark: JS Reduce - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();
var array =  ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z'];
var reducer = (r, x) => r + x;

Tests:

Lodash FP
fp.reduce(reducer, '', array)
Lodash
_.reduce(array, reducer, '')
Vanila JS
array.reduce(reducer, '');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash FP
Lodash
Vanila JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/76.0.3809.71 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 76 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash FP	856099.3 Ops/sec
Lodash	1106121.0 Ops/sec
Vanila JS	773698.8 Ops/sec

JS Reduce (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash FP vs Lodash vs Vanila JS

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash FP

Lodash

Vanila JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A