Run results for: Array.prototype.concat vs Array.prototype.push spread vs spread

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/69.0.3497.100 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 69

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.13.6

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 5 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Array.prototype.concat	2231832.0 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.push spread	4625108.0 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.concat.apply	1222189.0 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.push.apply	2403953.0 Ops/sec
Spread	4899478.0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var params = [ "hello", true, 1, { foo: 'bar' } ];
var concat = (input) => [].concat(params);
var push = (input) => [].push(...input);
var concatApply = (input) => Array.prototype.concat.apply([], input);
var pushApply = (input) => Array.prototype.push.apply([], input);
var spread = (input) => [...input];

Tests:

Array.prototype.concat
const result = concat(params);
Array.prototype.push spread
const result = push(params);
Array.prototype.concat.apply
const result = concatApply(params);
Array.prototype.push.apply
const result = pushApply(params);
Spread
const result = spread(params);

Run results for: Array.prototype.concat vs Array.prototype.push spread vs spread

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

Array.prototype.concat

Array.prototype.push spread

Array.prototype.concat.apply

Array.prototype.push.apply

Spread