Run results for: moment vs date-fns parsing

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/114.0

Browser: Firefox 114

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 10 months ago

Test name	Executions per second
moment	58935.7 Ops/sec
date-fns	131676.3 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.1/moment.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.30.1/date_fns.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.__date__ = new Date().toISOString();
window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';

Tests:

moment
var actual = moment(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
date-fns
var actual = dateFns.format(__date__, 'YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);

Run results for: moment vs date-fns parsing

It's not a deep validation; I'm just comparing ONE function that those two libraries have in common.

moment

date-fns