Benchmark: Generator with low count of items

Script Preparation code:

function* createGenerator() {
  var i;
  for (i = 0; i < 0; i++) {
    yield i;
  }
}

function createClosure() {
  var i = 0;
  return {
    next() {
      var result;
      if (i < 0) {
        result = {
          value: i,
          done: false
        };
	    i++;
      } else {
        result = {
          value: undefined,
          done: true
        };
      }
      return result;
    }
  };
}

Tests:

ES6 generator
var gen = createGenerator(), result; while (!(result = gen.next()).done) { window.result = result.value; }
Closure polyfill
var gen = createClosure(), result; while (!(result = gen.next()).done) { window.result = result.value; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
ES6 generator
Closure polyfill

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 15_0_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 15 on iOS 15.0.2

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
ES6 generator	10981960.0 Ops/sec
Closure polyfill	4934771.0 Ops/sec

Generator with low count of items (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: ES6 generator vs Closure polyfill

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

ES6 generator

Closure polyfill

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A