Benchmark: Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs Object in vs Object[] vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Set.has

Script Preparation code:

  var object = {},
      array = [],
      set = new Set(),
      i, test = 1000;
  
  for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
   object['something' + i] = true;
   array.push('something' + i);
   set.add('something' + i);
  }

Tests:

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, 'something' + test)
Object in
('something' + test) in object
Array.indexOf
array.indexOf('something' + test) !== -1
direct
object['something' + test] === true
Array includes
array.includes('something' + test)
Set has
set.has('something' + test)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
Object in
Array.indexOf
direct
Array includes
Set has

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.54 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 95 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty	4189001.0 Ops/sec
Object in	5519183.0 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf	1088871.0 Ops/sec
direct	5581476.0 Ops/sec
Array includes	1091576.0 Ops/sec
Set has	6293361.0 Ops/sec

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs Object in vs Object[] vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Set.has (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs Object in vs Array.indexOf vs direct vs Array includes vs Set has

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty

Object in

Array.indexOf

direct

Array includes

Set has

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A