Benchmark: Lodash vs Ramda vs Native 28/01/2022

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.28.0/ramda.min.js" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

Script Preparation code:

  var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  });
  
  function isOdd(num) {
    return num % 2 === 1;
  }
  
  function square(num) {
    return num * num;
  }
  
  function lessThanThreeDigits(num) {
    return num.toString().length < 3;
  }

Tests:

Lodash
var result = _.chain(data) .map(item => item.counter) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits) .value();
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
var result = R.filter( lessThanThreeDigits, R.map( square, R.filter( isOdd, R.pluck('counter', data), ), ), );
Ramda with currying and composition
var result = R.pipe( R.pluck('counter'), R.filter(isOdd), R.map(square), R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits) )(data);
Native
var result = data .map(x => x.counter) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits) ;
transducer
const transducer = R.compose(R.map((x) => x.counter), R.filter(isOdd), R.map(square), R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits)); const results = R.into([], transducer, data);
transducer2
const transducer = R.compose(R.map((x) => x.counter), R.filter(isOdd), R.map(square), R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits)); const results = R.transduce(transducer, (xs, x) => (xs.push(x), xs), [], data);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
Ramda with currying and composition
Native
transducer
transducer2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 14324.72.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.91 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 97 on Chrome OS 14324.72.0

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	550.4 Ops/sec
Ramda without relying on currying or composition	483.8 Ops/sec
Ramda with currying and composition	422.4 Ops/sec
Native	550.8 Ops/sec
transducer	507.6 Ops/sec
transducer2	494.4 Ops/sec

Lodash vs Ramda vs Native 28/01/2022 (version: 0)

Tests libraries lodash, ramda and native array functions on a sequence of map, filter, map filter operations.

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition vs Ramda with currying and composition vs Native vs transducer vs transducer2

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

Ramda with currying and composition

Native

transducer

transducer2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A