Benchmark: set has vs list includes

Tests:

get from set nope
new Set([470,364,173,535,140,374,442,64,245,69,323,155,529,405,131,431,445,281,164,576]).has(51)
get from set last
new Set([470,364,173,535,140,374,442,64,245,69,323,155,529,405,131,431,445,281,164,576]).has(576)
get from set first
new Set([470,364,173,535,140,374,442,64,245,69,323,155,529,405,131,431,445,281,164,576]).has(470)
get from list nope
[470,364,173,535,140,374,442,64,245,69,323,155,529,405,131,431,445,281,164,576].includes(51)
get from list last
[470,364,173,535,140,374,442,64,245,69,323,155,529,405,131,431,445,281,164,576].includes(576)
get from list first
[470,364,173,535,140,374,442,64,245,69,323,155,529,405,131,431,445,281,164,576].includes(470)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 109 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

set has vs list includes (version: 0)