Benchmark: typedarry for vs for..of vs forEach

Script Preparation code:

var array = new Uint32Array(new Array(100).fill(0).map((v, i) => i));
var val;

Tests:

for
var len = array.length; for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) { val = array[i]; }
forEach
array.forEach(function(value) { val = value; });
for..of
for (var value of array) { val = value; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for
forEach
for..of

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) fe-mem-test/1.0.0 Chrome/80.0.3987.163 Electron/8.5.5 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 80 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for	56407.4 Ops/sec
forEach	86207.8 Ops/sec
for..of	96734.4 Ops/sec

typedarry for vs for..of vs forEach (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for vs forEach vs for..of

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

for

forEach

for..of

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A