Benchmark: Timezone format: Intl.DateTimeFormat vs. Moment.js vs. Luxon

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/luxon/3.3.0/luxon.min.js" integrity="sha512-KKbQg5o92MwtJKR9sfm/HkREzfyzNMiKPIQ7i7SZOxwEdiNCm4Svayn2DBq7MKEdrqPJUOSIpy1v6PpFlCQ0YA==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window._date = new Date();
window._now = _date.getTime();
window._iso = _date.toISOString();

Tests:

Native
const dateTimeFormat = new Intl.DateTimeFormat("en-GB", { timeZone: "Europe/Prague", timeZoneName: "longOffset", year: "numeric", month: "2-digit", day: "2-digit", hour: "2-digit", minute: "2-digit", second: "2-digit", }).formatToParts(_now); var dt = {}; dateTimeFormat.forEach((arrayPart) => { if (arrayPart.type !== "literal") { dt[arrayPart.type] = arrayPart.value; } }); var date = `${dt.year}-${dt.month}-${dt.day}T${dt.hour}:${dt.minute}:${dt.second}${dt.timeZoneName.slice(3)}`; console.assert(date === _iso);
Luxon
var date = luxon.DateTime.now().setZone('Europe/Prague').toISO(); console.assert(date === _iso);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Luxon

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native	6125.2 Ops/sec
Luxon	31324.8 Ops/sec

Timezone format: Intl.DateTimeFormat vs. Moment.js vs. Luxon (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native vs Luxon

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native

Luxon

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A