MeasureThat.net
  • Create a benchmark
  • Online Toolsnew
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

 RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.startsWith (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match vs String.startsWith

Created: 6 months ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

  • String.includes

  • String.match

  • String.startsWith

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    RegEx.test
    String.includes
    String.match
    String.startsWith

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1
Mobile Safari 17 on iOS 17.0
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 5568805.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 8018066.0 Ops/sec
String.match 3985647.0 Ops/sec
String.startsWith 8293766.0 Ops/sec