Benchmark: Lodash sort vs array.prototype.sort fork for spread

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}

var arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){
  arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)});
}

Tests:

_.sortBy
_.sortBy(arr,"value");
array.prototype.sort
arr.sort((a,b) => a.value - b.value);
array.prototype.sort2
[...arr].sort((a,b) => a.value - b.value);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.sortBy
array.prototype.sort
array.prototype.sort2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/118.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 118 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
_.sortBy	35.3 Ops/sec
array.prototype.sort	836.5 Ops/sec
array.prototype.sort2	790.4 Ops/sec

Lodash sort vs array.prototype.sort fork for spread (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: _.sortBy vs array.prototype.sort vs array.prototype.sort2

Created: 6 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

_.sortBy

array.prototype.sort

array.prototype.sort2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A