Benchmark: _.filter.length vs filter.length vs reduce.length

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

storage = [
  { data: '1', status: '0' },
  { data: '2', status: '0' },
  { data: '3', status: '0' },
  { data: '4', status: '0' },
  { data: '5', status: '0' },
  { data: '6', status: '0' },
  { data: '7', status: '1' },
];

Tests:

reduce
storage.reduce((counter, { status }) => status === '0' ? counter += 1 : counter, 0)
filter
storage.filter(item => item.status === '0').length
_.filter
_.filter(storage, item => item.status === '0').length

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
reduce
filter
_.filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
reduce	13855690.0 Ops/sec
filter	12081830.0 Ops/sec
_.filter	5343038.0 Ops/sec

_.filter.length vs filter.length vs reduce.length (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: reduce vs filter vs _.filter

Created: one month ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

reduce

filter

_.filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A