Benchmark: Escape HTML - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

function escapeHtmlMultii (unsafe) {
  return unsafe
    .replace(/&/g, '&amp;')
    .replace(/</g, '&lt;')
    .replace(/>/g, '&gt;')
    .replace(/"/g, '&quot;')
    .replace(/'/g, '&#039;');
}

function escapeHtmlSingle (unsafe) {
  var chars = {
    '&': '&amp;',
    '<': '&lt;',
    '>': '&gt;',
    '"': '&quot;',
    '\'': '&#039;'
  };
  return unsafe.replace(/([&<>"'])/g, function (_, c) { return chars[c] });
}

var strings = ['<script></script>', '&&& < > \' neiarnotrnsat "', 'nrsoiatnoirsant > <> < >T<RSt " &&& \''];

Tests:

Using multiple .replace
escapeHtmlMultii(strings[0]); escapeHtmlMultii(strings[1]); escapeHtmlMultii(strings[2]);
Using a single .replace
escapeHtmlSingle(strings[0]); escapeHtmlSingle(strings[1]); escapeHtmlSingle(strings[2]);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using multiple .replace
Using a single .replace

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Escape HTML (version: 2)

Compare using multiple .replace vs a single replace with a function that maps the characters

Comparing performance of: Using multiple .replace vs Using a single .replace

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Using multiple .replace

Using a single .replace

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results