Benchmark: decimal.js vs. Fraction.js

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/decimal.js@10.2.0/decimal.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/fraction.js@4.0.12/fraction.min.js"></script>

Tests:

Native
var a = 0.1; var b = 0.2; ((a + b) * b).toString();
Native + toFixed
var a = 0.1; var b = 0.2; ((a + b) * b).toFixed(9);
decimal.js
var a = new Decimal("0.1"); var b = new Decimal("0.2"); a.plus(b).times(b).toString();
Fraction.js
var a = new Fraction("0.1"); var b = new Fraction("0.2"); a.add(b).mul(b).toString();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Native + toFixed
decimal.js
Fraction.js

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 123 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native	40468980.0 Ops/sec
Native + toFixed	5216453.0 Ops/sec
decimal.js	543737.3 Ops/sec
Fraction.js	901645.6 Ops/sec

decimal.js vs. Fraction.js (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native vs Native + toFixed vs decimal.js vs Fraction.js

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native

Native + toFixed

decimal.js

Fraction.js

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A